首页> 外文OA文献 >Dosimetric evaluation of 120-leaf multileaf collimator in a Varian linear accelerator with 6-MV and 18-MV photon beams
【2h】

Dosimetric evaluation of 120-leaf multileaf collimator in a Varian linear accelerator with 6-MV and 18-MV photon beams

机译:带有6-MV和18-MV光子束的Varian线性加速器中的120叶多叶准直器的剂量学评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this study the dosimetric characteristics of 120-leaf multileaf collimators (MLCs) were evaluated for 6-MV and 18-MV photon beams. The dose rate, percentage depth dose, surface dose, dose in the build-up region, beam profile, flatness, symmetry, and penumbra width were measured using three field-defining methods: (i) ‘Jaw only’, (ii) ‘MLC only’, and (iii) ‘MLC+Jaw’. Analysis of dose rate shows that the dose rate for ‘MLC only’ field was higher than that for ‘Jaw only” and ‘MLC+Jaw’ fields in both the energies. The ‘percentage of difference’ of dose rates between ‘MLC only’ and ‘MLC+Jaw’ was (0.9% to 4.4%) and (1.14% to 7%) for 6 MV and 18 MV respectively. The surface dose and dose in the build-up region were more pronounced for ‘MLC only’ fields for both energies, and no significant difference was found in percentage depth dose beyond dmax for both energies. Beam profiles show that flatness and symmetry for both the energies were less than the 3%. The penumbra width for ‘MLC only’ field was more than that for the other two field-defining methods by (1 to 2 mm) and (0.8 to 1.3 mm) for 6-MV and 18-MV photon beams respectively. Analysis of ‘width of 50% dose level’ of the beam profiles at dmax to reflect the field size shows 1 to 2 mm more for 6-MV photons and 2.2 to 2.4 mm morefor 18-MV photons for ‘MLC only’ fields. The results of this study suggest that the characteristics of 120-leaf MLC system with 6 MV and 18 MV are same in all aspects except the surface dose, penumbra, dose in the build-up region, and width of 50% dose levels.
机译:在这项研究中,针对6-MV和18-MV光子束,评估了120叶多叶准直器(MLC)的剂量特性。剂量率,百分比深度剂量,表面剂量,聚集区域的剂量,光束轮廓,平坦度,对称性和半影宽度是使用三种场限定方法测量的:(i)“仅钳制”,(ii)“仅适用于MLC”,以及(iii)“ MLC + Jaw”。剂量率分析显示,在两种能量中,“仅MLC”场的剂量率均高于“仅钳子”和“ MLC + Jaw”场的剂量率。对于6 MV和18 MV,“仅MLC”和“ MLC +钳”之间的剂量率“差异百分比”分别为(0.9%至4.4%)和(1.14%至7%)。对于两种能量的“仅MLC”场,表面剂量和堆积区域的剂量更为明显,对于两种能量,超过dmax的百分比深度剂量均未发现显着差异。光束轮廓表明,两种能量的平坦度和对称性均小于3%。 “仅MLC”场的半影宽分别比6-MV和18-MV光子束的(1-2mm)和(0.8-1.3mm)多于其他两种场限定方法。分析dmax处的光束轮廓的“ 50%剂量水平宽度”以反映场的大小,对于6-MV光子,对于18-MV光子,仅“ MLC”场增加1-2mm,而对于18-MV光子增加2.2-2.4mm。这项研究的结果表明,具有6 MV和18 MV的120叶MLC系统的特性在所有方面都是相同的,除了表面剂量,半影,堆积区域的剂量以及50%剂量水平的宽度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号